Stepping into 2019


During this year I have had the opportunity to experience a variety of aspects of life here at Katikati College. From working with a great collaborate team of year 7/8 teachers, to assisting my HOF/Dean with restructuring and streamlining procedures around student leadership and planning, to being a part of the teachers item in the school LipSync competition and now stepping up to the challenge of the Deputy Principal role. 

I have seen, even over a very short time, huge change within the school structure and processes. The need for me to be able to sit back and 'ruminate' rather than 'react', is something I know I need to work on. With my role in the school in a constant flux and the re-imagining of the Learning Centre and structures/processes around it, the need for me to be more  rigid with my own thought/problem solving processes is important in order to fulfill my role.





Why I need to apply this:

The Ladder of Inference will help me draw better conclusions, or challenge other people's conclusions based on true facts and reality. It can be used to help me analyse hard data - carefully looking at the data that will be produced from the new Learning Support Register. I can also use it to help validate or challenge other people's conclusions and my own about events or problems as they arise.

The step-by-step reasoning process will help me to remain objective - and not to just focus on assumptions and, when working or challenging others, reach a shared conclusion without conflict.


The following steps will help me to challenge thinking using the Ladder of Inference:
1. Stop! It's time to consider your reasoning.

2. Identify where on the ladder you are. Are you:
• Selecting your data or reality?
• Interpreting what it means?
• Making or testing assumptions?
• Forming or testing conclusions?
• Deciding what to do and why?

3. From my current "rung", analyse my reasoning by working back down the ladder. This will help me trace the facts and reality that you are actually working with.

• At each stage, ask myself WHAT I am thinking and WHY. As I analyse each step, I
may need to adjust my reasoning. For example you may need to change some assumption or
extend the field of data you have selected.

• The following questions can help me work backwards (coming down the ladder, starting at the top):
1. Why have I chosen this course of action? Are there other actions I should have
considered?
2. What belief lead to that action? Was it well-founded?
3. Why did I draw that conclusion? is the conclusion sound?
4. What am I assuming, and why? Are my assumptions valid?
5. What data have I chosen to use and why? Have I selected data rigorously?
6. What are the real facts that I should be using? Are there other facts I should
consider?
4. With a new sense of reasoning (and perhaps a wider field of data and more considered
assumptions), you can now work forwards again – step-by-step – up the rungs of the ladder.


REMEMBER: 

Use the Ladder of Inference at any of stage of my thinking process.

• Is this the "right" conclusion?
• Why am I making these assumptions?
• Why do I think this is the "right" thing to do?
• Is this really based on all the facts?
• Why does he believe that?

When I am working through my reasoning, look out for rungs that I tend to jump - like to the top in severe reactive situations!
Focus on not making assumptions too easily.
Don't select only part of the data, get the whole picture before making conclusions.

Note my tendencies so that I can learn to do that stage of reasoning with extra care in the future.
Try explaining my reasoning to a colleague or friend. This will help me check that ymy argument is sound.


Setting up for Success

To Do...
* contact John McGovern - advice on the best database to use for SENCO - Learning Support Register
* contact Paul Prangley - the best and most efficient use of the Waimarino space
* speak with other SENCO's  to gauge the best systems to adapt to our needs
* meet with KKP, Pahoia and other contributing schools
* get advice on the best Reading Materials for my new role
 a good choice?

* gather academic readings relating to the successful set up of systems
* set up regular meetings with Barb, RTLB, MOE etc


...lots of questions, lots of ideas, many different lens to view through. 

What is best for our students?
What is currently being done?
What is the system?
What are the current issues with the system?
Who is involved in this system?
Who needs to be involved?
Are there other approaches/systems/ways we could do it better?


FIND A GOOD MODEL FOR CHANGE TO USE AS A GUIDE TO THIS PROCESS.





New possibilities...


New responsibilities... new possibilities...new challenges..

A change in my current position at KKC has been a bit of a shock, but a very welcomed one.  Being the new DP will enable me to step and and make my own MARK on the school and with the students.

Time now to reflect, revisit and re-imagine what the areas of the school I am in charge of could look like and work with the people in these areas to improve systems and student outcomes.

As term 3 comes to a close...reflections and looking ahead to term 4 and 2019

Kotare:

* fabulous co-constructed learning around global warming and the resulting rising sea levels. Students created either a house/village/school/animal shelter that will with stand this environmental change and allow the people of the Pasifika to stay on their home island.

* Life Education - the challenge and hilarity of teaching puberty to 12 and 13 year olds!








Looking ahead...

* Do I apply?
* Where do I want to be in 2019?
* Do I want leadership?
* If so, what role?
* How much?
* Do I want to change year level?
* If so, how far up the school?

Image result for images about making hard decisions

...I may as well throw my hat in the ring and see what comes up....


A Collection of Thoughts weeks 2-6

 Winding up the Hockey season with the team coming 4th. It was a steep learning curve coming from primary grades to 2nd XI but we had fun and many of the girls are well on their way to becoming talented players.
This term I had to face an old nemissis, integers.  This area of maths gave me nightmares as a 13 year old, so, now faced with the reality to having to teach this to my maths class, I was again quaking at the knees. We are still not best and fast friends, but are getting along for the sake of the students!


 Oh the variety of topics! The students have spent the best part of the last 5 weeks, pla nning and creating and crafting and moulding and applying small squares of typed text onto cue cards! Many hours practising infront of the mirror, to the family cat, with friends and in the shower.

Thwe proof will now be in the execution of delivery...
I had a fabulous workshop session with Hamish as part of the IT Learning Circles.  This app has plenty to offer. The plan is to now incorporate this with my PLD focus on unpacking and playing around with the new Digital Technologies curriculum.  Maybe as part of a Google Site? Watch this space...

Week 1 Term 3 2018

Holiday Reading and Reflecting

Book: Disobedient Teaching - Welby Ings

What caught my interest:

In light of the recent committee and whole school discussions around how things are changing in the education system around NCEA structure, and the proposed changes within the school, I found sections of this book thought provoking.

"Each of us , irrespective of where we stand in an organisation, has the ability to change things. It is the nature of education we should question, and it is the nature of proffessionalisim that we should seek to improve on practise the we recognise as flawed." (pge 22)

Welby discusses two types of personality that often clash during times of impending change:

* the disobedient thinker - the creative people who think beyond limitations and beyond the proscribed and mediocre. Productive disobedience that broadens our world. With optismisim and knowing the necessity they can look into the heart of what exists and conceive effective alternatives realising new social, economic, technological and political reforms that better meet ordinary poeple's needs.

Teachers often say we want to be more creative, we recognise it when we see a more creative way of approach, but we find it difficult to accomodate the teaching of it into an evidence based paradigm that relently infects the structure of our education system. Creative thinking is not only nebulous and difficult to massage into assessable performances,  it is also often disruptive of time and resources.


* the social editor -  this can be the cautioning voice everyone has that says 'no' to your ideas because they might sound silly, or they might not work, or they might be unstable, or they might make you look like a fool. It is silent and controlling it has phenomenal power and it casues you to function at lower levels than what you are capable of and tells you that you are not empowered to change things. The social editor protects the perniciousness of cool, particularly in students, and may threaten the chance of taking risks as they might lead to public failure and peer riducule.

Collegues that support our sometimes deemed outragously out there ideas, but have a more practical approach to problem solving, can also be our social editor. Conflicts often arise when the outrageous meets the cautionary, however, to be future focused, these oposing views need to form an alliance in order for improvement and change.


I believe that a succesful organisation is one that has a mix of the above. Shooting for the stars, talking about 'in the perfect world', or in the 'best scenario', then molding the ideas to fit within the context, ensuring the vision  is still intact enables future thinking and sustainability. This approach preserves ones 'coolness', meets the needs of the requirement of change and allows creativity by softly and respectfully applying a gentle 'handbrake' to reduce the speed, not the enthusiasm and ideas.


Thursday 21 June 2018

Personal Reflection Week 8 Term 2 2018

Re: Committee Meeting - Curriculum and Assessment:
because I am a 7/8 teacher and have never taught at secondary level, a lot of the discussion did not apply to me

From the perspective of a teacher that is new to the school and new to the college way of life:

*     Is there a way we can structure our curriculum so that there was more of a relationship between 7/8 and 9/10? I feel we are separate from the rest of the school, it seems quite disjointed to me. Would vertical form rooms help this? A closer working relationship between all of the teachers in that form pod - a clear pathway from 7-13? Even if it is just talking to each other more about learning and best practice?

*    Is there a way that we could structure our learning: ACADEMIC/APPLIED style? parallel pathways that can crossover?

ie: a student who is more wired to a trade type vocation pathway can choose to go the APPLIED route and standards, however, if they would like to cross over and do a paper or two in the ACADEMIC route and standards that relates to it they can and visa versa? 
More of a chance to set up for a beginning vocation once they leave school rather than just taking subjects?
May be an answer to keeping our challenging students engaged and at school if there is a clear pathway for something they may be interested in from the time they step in KKC? at 7/8 level? Link into local businesses that offer that trade/vocation?